Conflicts Beyond Borders – Possibilities for International Alternative Conflict Resolution

Authors

  • Mizser Csilla Ilona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv5n4-003

Keywords:

Transformation, Solution, Intermediary, Neutrality, Confidentiality, Cross-Border Mediation

Abstract

Mediation is one kind of procedures to solve a conflict. Mediation is based on the voluntary participation of the parties. Mediation is a voluntary process in which an impartial person (the mediator) helps with communication and promotes reconciliation between the parties which will allow them to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. It is a procedure, in which an intermediary without adjudicatory powers systematically facilitates communication between the parties with the aim of enabling the parties themselves to take responsibility for resolving their dispute. The procedure has the character of confidentiality and the neutrality. Mediation is a negotiation procedure facilitated by a neutral third-party who assists the parties in moving to resolution. The neutral third party has no control over the outcome of the case and conflict, but controls and directs the process itself, he or she is responsible for the procedure. While court proceedings are authoritative, formalised and claim-oriented, mediation offers a flexible, self-determined approach in which all aspects of the conflict -independent of their legal relevance- may be considered. Against this background, mediation -in contrast to court proceedings- is described as alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The question is: to solve the conflict and find a solution or to transform a conflict and reshape the connection between the parties? What is the matter when the mediation process has to be conducted between parties, who live in different countries or when one person of the parents just want to go abroad with the common child or children. How can cross-border mediation help? This publication tries to show a possible answer.

References

Annual Report of the President of the National Office for the Judiciary. (2015). English Version (pp. 16-17).

Annual Report of the President of the National Office for the Judiciary. (2016). Hungarian Version (pp. 75). Retrieved from: www.birosag.hu

Cross Border Mediation. Retrieved from www.crossbordermediation.eu

Csilla, K. M. (2016). Mediáció a jogi személyek életében I. Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században VI. tanulmánykötet, Óbudai Egyetem Keleti Károly Gazdasági Kar, Budapest. Retrieved from: http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/publikaciok

Csilla, K. M. (2017). Mediáció a jogi személyek életében II.-munkaügyi mediáció Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században VII. tanulmánykötet, 2017. Óbudai Egyetem Keleti Károly Gazdasági Kar, Budapest. Retrieved from: http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/publikaciok

European E-justice. (2020). Principles and stages. Retrieved from: https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_key_principles_and_stages_of_mediation-383-en.do?clang=en

European Mediation Network Initiative. EMNI. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.european-mediation.eu

http://mediaciokonyv.hu/kapcsolodo_anyagok/kozvetitoi-statisztikak/

Lederach J.P. (2003). The Little Book Of Conflict Transformation. New York, NY: Good Books.

Rosenberg, M., & Chopra, D. (2015). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life: Life-Changing Tools for Healthy Relationships. PuddleDancer Press.

Sáriné. S. E. (2012). Mediáció-Közvetítői eljárások. HVGOrac Lap- és Könyvkiadó Kft., Budapest (p. 174).

Semi-Annual Report of the President of the National Office for the Judiciary. (2016). English Version (p. 17).

The Directive 2008/52/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters.

www.mediateyourlife.com

www.nonviolentcommunication.com

Downloads

Published

2024-04-04

How to Cite

Ilona, M. C. (2024). Conflicts Beyond Borders – Possibilities for International Alternative Conflict Resolution. South Florida Journal of Development, 5(4), e3797. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv5n4-003