Ethics of artificial intelligence


  • Carlos Rios-Campos
  • Sandra Marcela Zapata Vega
  • Mariuxi Ileana Tejada-Castro
  • Jessica Del Consuelo Luzuriaga Viteri
  • Erick Orlando Guerrero Zambrano
  • José Manuel Barandiarán Gamarra
  • Jorge Bautista Núñez
  • Flor Elizabeth Obregón Vara



ethics, artificial intelligence


The general objective of the research was to determine the advances related to the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. The most powerful countries are investing large amounts of economic resources in the development of artificial intelligence. Methodology, in this research, 49 documents have been selected, carried out in the period 2018 - 2023; including: scientific articles, review articles and information from websites of recognized organizations. Results, the ethics of artificial intelligence is supported by various countries. Furthermore, ChatGPT is considered a major threat in the automation of academic document preparation. Conclusions, about the general objective of the research is to determine the advances related to the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, it is important to consider the transparency and risks of applying AI. In addition, consider ethical aspects such as the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence was adopted by UNESCO's General Conference at its 41st session. The European Union (EU) is considering a new legal framework about regulations on the development and use of artificial intelligence. ChatGPT is an AI tool that needs to be carefully evaluated for its impact on education and other human activities. About the first specific objective of the research was to identify the countries that invest the most money in artificial intelligence, there are Japan, Singapore, China, India, Russia, Australia, Unite States of America, and the European Union. About the second specific objective of the research was to determine the risks and requirements of artificial intelligence, the risks are black-box models, privacy violations, bias and discrimination and the requirements are algorithmic transparency, human understandable explanations, privacy-preserving algorithms, data cooperatives, algorithmic fairness.


Ade-Ibijola, A., Okonkwo, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Africa: Emerging Challenges. In: Eke, D.O., Wakunuma, K., Akintoye, S. (eds) Responsible AI in Africa. Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI:

AI (2023). About Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from

Amisha, Malik, P., Pathania, M., & Rathaur, V. K. (2019). Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 8(7), 2328–2331. DOI:

Anyoha, R. (2017). The History of Artificial Intelligence. Blog, Special Edition on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from

Barrero, A. & Rosero, A. (2018). Estado del Arte sobre Concepciones de la Diversidad en el Contexto Escolar Infantil. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 2018, 12(1), 39-55 DOI:

Baum, S.D. (2020). Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence. AI & Soc 35, 165–176. DOI:

Briganti G and Le Moine O (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Today and Tomorrow. Front. Med. 7:27. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00027 DOI:

Cambridge Dictionary (2023). Ethic. Retrieved from

Centre for Civil Society and Governance (2020). Ethics in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Initiative for the Asia Pacific. Retrieved from

Chatterjee, S. and N.S., S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and human rights: a comprehensive study from Indian legal and policy perspective. International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 110-134. DOI:

Cui, M. & Zhang, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence and computational pathology, Laboratory Investigation, Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages 412-422, ISSN 0023-6837. DOI:

Department of Industry, Science and Resources (2023). Investments to grow Australia’s critical technologies industries. Retrieved from

DeSmith, C. (2023). Why China has edge on AI, what ancient emperors tell us about Xi Jinping. Retrieved from

Dwivedi, Y. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management,

Volume 71. 102642. ISSN 0268-4012. DOI:

Elias, J. (2023). AI for All: How India is carving its own path in the global AI race. Retrieved from

European Parliament (2023). AI Act: a step closer to the first rules on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from

Feingold, S. (2023). The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, explained. Retrieved from

Government of Canada (2015). What is ethics?.

Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, et al. (2019). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 70(4):329-334. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2019.08.010 DOI:

Heikkilä, M. (2023). Suddenly, everyone wants to talk about how to regulate AI. Retrieved from (2023). Office for Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from

Hiroshi Miyashita (2021). Human-centric data protection laws and policies: A lesson from Japan, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 40, 105487, ISSN 0267-3649. DOI:

IBM (2020). What is artificial intelligence (AI)?. Retrieved from

Khanna, A. & Khanna, P. (2020). Where Asia Is Taking The World With AI. Retrieved from

Khoury, Z. & Lesnichaya, Y. (2022). Harnessing trustworthy artificial intelligence: A lesson from Korea. Retrieved from

Lepri, B., Oliver, N. & Pentland, A. (2021). Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence. iScience, Volume 24, Issue 3, 102249. ISSN 2589-0042. DOI:

Lim, W., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J., Pallant, J. & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, Volume 21, Issue 2, 100790. ISSN 1472-8117. DOI:

Lund, B., Wang, T., Reddy, N., Nie, B., Shimray, S., Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. DOI:

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the People's Republic of China (2022). Position Paper of the People's Republic of China on Strengthening Ethical Governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Retrieved from

Müller, Vincent C. (2021). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from

Nath, R., Manna, R. (2023). From posthumanism to ethics of artificial intelligence. AI & Soc 38, 185–196. DOI:

News European Parliament (2020). What is artificial intelligence and how is it used?. Retrieved from

Papyshev, G., Yarime, M. (2022). The limitation of ethics-based approaches to regulating artificial intelligence: regulatory gifting in the context of Russia. AI & Soc. DOI:

Paraman, P. & Anamalah, S. (2023). Ethical artificial intelligence framework for a good AI society: principles, opportunities and perils. AI & Soc 38, 595–611. DOI:

Perlman, A. (2023). The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society. Retrieved from

Petrella, S., Miller, C. & Cooper, B. (2021). Russia's Artificial Intelligence Strategy: The Role of State-Owned Firms, Orbis, Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 75-100, ISSN 0030-4387. DOI:

Rios-Campos, C., Cánova, E. S. M., Zaquinaula, I. R. A., Zaquinaula, H. E. A., Vargas, D. J. C., Peña, W. S., Idrogo, C. E. T., & Arteaga, R. M. Y. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Education. South Florida Journal of Development, 4(2), 641–655. DOI:

Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V., Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation. In: Floridi, L. (eds) Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 144. Springer, Cham. DOI:

Roy, A. (2022). Why India needs to talk more about AI Ethics. Retrieved from

Ryan, M. and Stahl, B.C. (2021). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 61-86. DOI:

Salas-Pilco, S.Z., Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 19, 21. DOI:

Salvagno, M., Taccone, F.S. & Gerli, A.G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?. Crit Care 27, 75. DOI:

Schwalbe, N. & Wahl, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. The Lancet, Volume 395, Issue 10236. Pages 1579-1586. ISSN 0140-6736. DOI:

Taygerly, T. (2022). How to Develop a Strong Work Ethic. Retrieved from

UNESCO (2023). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from

UNESCO (2023). Promotion and Implementation of the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Northeast Asia and the Asia Pacific region. Retrieved from

Vivek Kaul, Sarah Enslin, Seth A. Gross (2020). History of artificial intelligence in medicine, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Volume 92, Issue 4. Pages 807-812, ISSN 0016-5107. DOI:

Wu, F., Lu, C., Zhu, M. et al. (2020). Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China. Nat Mach Intell 2, 312–316. DOI:

Zakrzewski, C. & Lima, C. (2023). Europe moves ahead on AI regulation, challenging tech giants’ power. Retrieved from

Zhu, J. (2022). AI ethics with Chinese characteristics? Concerns and preferred solutions in Chinese academia. AI & Soc. DOI:




How to Cite

Rios-Campos, C., Vega, S. M. Z., Tejada-Castro, M. I., Viteri, J. D. C. L., Zambrano, E. O. G., Gamarra, J. M. B., Núñez, J. B., & Vara, F. E. O. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence. South Florida Journal of Development, 4(4), 1715–1729.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>